Category Archives: General Legal

Churchill Wisdom; On Guns

04/01/2013 BowTieLawyer 1 Comment

Winston Churchill, who appears not infrequently as a part of this blog, was known to carry a firearm on his person.

The above, a 1896 Broomhandle Mauser, was his military issued firearm.

According to British firearms author and historian Richard Law, knowing Churchill had been targeted by Hitler’s agents for assassination, Churchill always went armed, his bodyguards notwithstanding. He kept a Thompson sub-machine gun, loaded in a rack within easy reach in his official limousine. Discovering that his chief bodyguard carried a little .32 Webley, Churchill ordered a new Colt Government Model .45 for his him. A short time later, Churchill asked the chief bodyguard how he liked the new pistol. The man replied that he was still carrying the .32 because the Colt was too heavy.

“Give it to me, then,” snapped Churchill, as he shoved it into his overcoat. This became the great leader’s personal carry gun until the end of the war.

Prior Churchill Wisdom includes;

Mississippi, beginning in July, will allow open carry and 2 levels of concealed carry are currently available for residents.

Matthew Thompson is a family law attorney in Mississippi. Contact TLF with your family law or firearm law related inquiry.

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer Visit the website: Thompson Law Firm

You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@wmtlawfirm.com.

alienation, Crime, Divorce, General Legal

Criminal Conversation (Just Sex)

03/29/2013 BowTieLawyer 1 Comment

Criminal Conversation is likely the most misleading term you will hear or read today. Criminal conversation, briefly mentioned in this prior blog on Alienation of Affection, is today’s topic.

Criminal Conversation is an act of adultery between a person and the spouse of another. This tort, meaning a civil wrong, commonly arises in Alienation of Affection situations, but differs greatly from AOA. Alienation allows a wronged spouse to sue the “significant other” of the guilty spouse for the breakdown of the marriage. It requires proof of 3 elements; 1) Wrongful Conduct, 2) loss of affections, and 3) a causal connection.

In Criminal Conversation if you have sex with a married person, who is not your spouse, you are guilty. There is no defense to the tort of criminal conversation.

Consent of the wife is no defense. The fact that the wrongdoer did not know the wife was married, but believed her to be single is not a defense. The fact that the wife represented herself as single is not a defense. The fact that the wife was the aggressor is not a defense. The fact that she has been neglected or mistreated by her husband is not a defense. The fact that she and her husband were separated through his fault is no defense.

Criminal Conversation has been hailed as “notorious for affording a fertile field for blackmail and extortion” and action may be brought “not for the purpose of preserving the marital relationship, but rather for purely mercenary or vindictive motives.”Kline v. Ansell, 287 Md. 585, 414 A.2d 929, at 931. (1980). Courts have found that this tort is “incompatible with today’s sense of fairness” because there are no defenses to a cause of action. Id.

Several arguments have been advanced for the abolition of it, including;

(1) a woman is no longer the property of her husband;
(2) the tort has no deterrent effect;
(3) a cause of action may be brought for vindictive purposes;
(4) the potential for abuse is great;
(5) the tort is devoid of any defenses; and
(6) determining damages, meaning money, is difficult.

So now that you are sweating about this, rest easy. Criminal Conversation was abolished by the MS Supreme Court in 1992 in the case of Saunders v. Alford, 607 So.2d 1214 (Miss. 1992). Alienation of Affection, however, is alive and well.

Matthew Thompson is a family law attorney in Mississippi. If you need to have a conversation with a lawyer about family law you know who to call.

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer

You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@bowtielawyer.ms

Crime, General Legal, Opinion

Open Carry in MS?

03/25/2013 BowTieLawyer 22 Comments

I have previously blogged on MS gun laws and recent tweaks in the law. In the paper, Sunday, there was an article that stated effective July, MS will allow open carry. (Perhaps, more accurately stated is that it appears that it is not prohibited.)

Previously, the MS Attorney General opined, in June 2012, which is only “advisory,” that it is illegal to carry a handgun without a license (concealed carry permit). The license requires that the entirety of the handgun be concealed. The above picture would be a violation of the old law. If the jacket were covering it completely, it would not be if you had a concealed carry permit. This will be changed effective July 1, 2013, and includes incidental unconcealment will not be a violation. My prior article regarded this “tweak” of the law. However, another inspection of the law change also reveals a few other things ADDED to and REMOVED from the prior law.

ADDED (paraphrasing)

97-37-1. (1) Except as otherwise provided in Section 45-9-101, any person who carries, concealed * * * on or about one’s person, any pistol, revolver… must have a concealed carry license.

(4) For the purposes of this section, “concealed” means hidden or obscured from common observation and shall not include any weapon listed in subsection (1) of this section, including, but not limited to, a loaded or unloaded pistol carried upon the person in a sheath, belt holster or shoulder holster that is wholly or partially visible, or carried upon the person in a scabbard or case for carrying the weapon that is wholly or partially visible.

This change now takes any pistol out of the definition of “concealed” if in a holster and visible or partly visible. This means the above picture is no longer a concealed handgun and no longer is subject to concealed carry license requirements.

The licensing requirements of this section do not apply to the carrying by any person of a stun gun, pistol or revolver, …that is not concealed as defined in Section 97-37-1.

So now the law change has established what the definition of “concealed” is NOT and that a pistol in a holster, on your person, that is visible is not concealed.

Now for the REMOVED section.

The prior law had a clause to the effect ‘that nothing herein may be used to authorize open carry…‘ This language has been deleted from the new law. The reason is because now this concealed carry law, which defines “concealed,” specifically excludes being applied to a pistol in a holster that is visible. It, by default, defines open carry.

There is a maxim in the law that holds that which is not prohibited is allowed. “Everything which is not forbidden is allowed” is a constitutional principle of English law — an essential freedom of the ordinary citizen. MS has no law, effective July, that prohibits open carry (and did not prior to this either, really). Or rather, MS law now defines a pistol in a holster as not concealed and therefore not subject to concealed carry license requirements.

So, what else is on the books? The MS Constitution guarantees our rights to keep and bear arms (along with the US Constitution). There is nothing else in the law regarding concealed or open carry for citizens.

You can read the bill for yourself here. While it is not black and white law allowing for open carry, there is now (July 2013) “nothing” which can be used to prohibit open carry. Interestingly, I have heard that the same restrictions to concealed carry apply to open carry, meaning limitations on locations and that if a person posted a sign that you could not carry on premises. I say “interestingly” because the prohibitions are all in the concealed carry license statute, the law which specifically authorizes concealed carry. The argument could be made that open carry is not subject to concealed carry rules because it is specifically excluded from the definition.

I predict some more law changes and litigation/law enforcement run-ins about this one.

Matthew Thompson is a family law attorney in Mississippi and supports your Second Amendment rights.

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer Visit the website: Thompson Law Firm

You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@bowtielawyer.ms

Divorce, General Legal, Opinion

Bad Advice = Bad Lawyer?

03/20/2013 BowTieLawyer 6 Comments

As a practicing attorney you are always learning from each case, each client, each Court appearance, and dealings with opposing counsel. Through all of this, there are memorable lessons learned and some you wish you had not.

Some memorable milestones are your first Court appearance, your first argument before the Court and the first satisfied client. I recently experienced a “milestone” that I wanted to share.

I was involved in a case where I “knew” who the other attorney was before he was “hired.” I knew based solely on the conduct of his client; destroying property, taking things that did not belong to him, damaging other property, having a poor attitude and ignoring attempts to communicate amicably and to resolve the outstanding issues without things escalating. I have this theory that clients tend to seek out and hire attorneys that are similar to themselves. Now, obviously this is not always true and too broad a generalization to make, but fitting for this instance. In any event, this other party decided to do some bad things.

As soon as I heard of the destruction, I said “I know who his attorney is.” It was not a good feeling. I was not proud of myself. I was disappointed that due to this conduct that I “knew” who he hired. This conduct and this advice is exactly why people hate attorneys and think we are lower than low.

So what did I do about it? Well, I tried to do the best I could. Set it for hearing and let the Judge have a say. The client may or may not have broken the law, but that didn’t make it right.

This milestone, unfortunately memorable, of knowing who the other attorney is by offensive conduct of his client actually reminded me that I do not ever want another attorney to “know” that I am involved in a case based upon offensive conduct of my client. Want to share to some war stories? Leave a comment or send an email, maybe I’ll blog about it.

Matthew Thompson is a Family Law attorney and strives to do what is right and is now getting off of his soapbox.

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer Visit the website: Thompson Law Firm

You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@wmtlawfirm.com.

Divorce, General Legal, Marriage, Opinion

Churchill Wisdom; On Advice

03/14/2013 BowTieLawyer 2 Comments

“In those days he was wiser than he is now; he used to frequently take my advice.”

-Winston Churchill

Following your attorney’s advice can be one of the more difficult aspects of divorce work, but you must. I have previously blogged on How to Hire an attorney, Keeping Quiet when necessary, Annoying Client Traits, and Coping with the Stress of a family law matter. One important and common theme to all of these is to listen and take the advice you are given. It is no guaranty of a perfect case, but it increases the potential for a satisfactory result. (So long as the person giving the advice knows what they are talking about.)

Matthew Thompson is a Family Law attorney and is good at telling people what to do.

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer Visit the website: Thompson Law Firm

You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@wmtlawfirm.com.

Child Custody, Divorce, General Legal, Visitation

Want a Happy Birthday?! Don’t Forget this “Holiday.”

03/12/2013 BowTieLawyer 1 Comment

Happy Birthday! is something we all look forward to sharing with our children. But, is this day saved in your Divorce Agreement?

Bday 2 — Happy Birthday/ BowTiePublishing

I have previously blogged on the “forgotten holidays” (Halloween, labor day) and visitation schedules. Birthdays are also often overlooked at times of divorce. A Court’s standard visitation does not include, specifically, children’s birthdays so it is up to you, as an attorney or client, to remember the dates that matter.

In most of my Agreements the child’s birthday is specifically considered. The following is an example.

The Father shall have custody of the minor child, at least, as the following times… “On the child’s birthday in odd-numbered years, from 8:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m., and from 2:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. in even-numbered years, or all other times as mutually agreed upon by the parties. The child shall be with the Mother on her birthday, including overnight, and with the Father on his birthday, including overnight.

Some alternative language is as follows;

The parents shall cooperate on each child’s birthday and shall plan to attend and pay for the child’s birthday party on an equal and reasonable basis. However, if the parents are unable to agree, then notwithstanding which parent has physical custody on the child’s birthday, the parent not having physical custody of the child on her birthday shall have the opportunity to celebrate the birthday with that child from 4:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. on her birthday.

None of the above language is perfect for every circumstance and the fact that it must be included could be an indicator that mom and dad are not working together in the child’s best interest. Also, parties can disagree on how to “cooperate” and what is “reasonable.” However, if you are dealing with a battle-axe it’s much better to have specific language and not need, than to need it and no have it.

Matthew Thompson is a Family Law attorney and wishes Claire a happy, happy, happy birthday!

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer Visit the website: Thompson Law Firm

You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@wmtlawfirm.com.

Divorce, General Legal, Marriage

Annulling your Marriage

03/08/2013 BowTieLawyer 2 Comments

Annulment is the process of revoking your marriage. It is a legal mechanism that dissolves the marriage by legally undoing it, as if you were never married. Annulment differs from divorce.

Annulment results in you being able to claim, truthfully, that you were never legally married. It erases the marriage.

Annulments are rare and only granted on a limited basis. Mississippi law provides for annulment via MCA 93-7-1, et seq. The statute allows for annulment in all instances of incest or bigamy with no time limitations for seeking the annulment. In fact, in these circumstances the marriage would be void. Also, incest and bigamy are grounds for divorce, so you could take your pick between seeking an annulment or divorce.

Annulment is allowed if one of the following was in existence at the time of the marriage ceremony;

incest (raised at any time)
bigamy (raised at any time)
incurable impotency
mental illness or incompetency (must be sought within 6 months of marriage)
failure to comply with licensure requirements AND no cohabitation
lack of understanding or want of age (not old enough to consent), or due to fraud or force (again w/i 6 months of marriage)
pregnancy of wife by another and husband did not know (w/i 6 months of marriage)

These are the grounds for annulment and if you don’t fall into one of these categories annulment is not an option. I have had numerous calls of persons married for weeks, or months who want to seek an annulment because they made a mistake. Mistake is not a ground for annulment.

**It should be noted that a legal annulment differs from a religious annulment. You can have one without the other and they have no bearing on one another. So is an annulment right for you? You better act quickly and know that in most instances it is not.

Matthew Thompson is a Family Law attorney and can help you erase your marriage mistake.

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer Visit the website: Thompson Law Firm

You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@wmtlawfirm.com.

General Legal, Opinion

MS Gun Law Update

03/06/2013 BowTieLawyer 12 Comments

I previously blogged on Mississippi gun law basics. Since that blog the Mississippi legislature passed two bills which tweaked one aspect of the prior blog and also added additional safeguards to persons possessing a concealed carry permit. (An additional “update” here on Open Carry in MS)

First the tweak. Prior to the change, a concealed weapon had to be “completely concealed” at all times in order to be legal. Having your firearm in a holster on your hip covered by a jacket was fine, but if you reached, stretched or adjusted and it became visible it was no longer “concealed,” and therefore a violation of the law. The law now provides that incidental “unconcealment” is not a violation. This is just a common sense change in the law.

Now the safeguard. Mississippi, along with 32 other states, now prohibits the release of the names of persons with a concealed carry permit. This is a safety issue as a New York newspaper recently published the names and addresses of all persons in Westchester County that had a concealed carry permit issued to them by the state of New York. After the article was published a home was specifically targeted for robbery due to the fact that the burglars suspected they could steal guns. Now whether a person has a concealed carry permit is protected not subject to disclosure pursuant to Freedom of Information Act requests. Though the information regarding concealed carry is still available to law enforcement and via valid subpoena.

Follow the blog: BowTieLawyer Visit the website: Thompson Law Firm
You may also contact Matthew with your family law case, question or concern at (601) 850-8000 or Matthew@wmtlawfirm.com.