Category Archives: Divorce

Chancery Courts, Covid and YOu.

The Capital Area Bar Association (CABA) recently held it’s second in a series of offerings featuring local Judges in the area discussing the Court’s efforts to adapt to continuing with Court in this Covid-era.

Stock internet image

Featured were Chancellors Owens, Grove and Roberts. Yours truly was the moderator for the panel. Some 40-odd attorneys were in attendance for this Zoom conference.

The Judge’s comments were similar with the challenges presented by Covid; some court delay with cases involving multiple litigants/attorneys, technical difficulties, and a little too-lax formality when Zooming.

The pro’s were commented on as well; more economical for parties, more efficient for the Court in certain cases, and allowed for out of town, out of state parties/witness to be accommodated with Zoom hearings.

The consensus is Covid and Zoom are both going to be here for a while so attorneys need to adapt. Additionally, some level of Zoom is here to stay and that will make Court and attorney’s more efficient for clients in the future.

If you are interested in learning more about CABA click.

Matthew Thompson is a civil litigation attorney in MS and managing in a Covid-crazed world.

Don’t Make Promises for Other People

We have the best of intentions…

It’s satisfying to help someone, but sometimes we are not in a position to help. It’s always nice to be able to provide the right answer, but sometimes we do not know the right answer. We may even know the person that would know the answer. However, the best course of action is suggesting they contact that person directly.

Likewise, parents should not promise the child what the other parent will do. Life happens. It may end up being something that the other parent cannot do. It may be an obligation that is impossible for them to meet. Promising your child that the other parent will do something is setting both the child and the other parent up for failure.

Don’t make promises for someone else to keep.

Matthew Thompson is a Mississippi civil trial lawyer and doesn’t make promises for other people.

Thompson Law Firm, pllc (601)850-8000

Happy Father’s Day!

Somebody can always do it cheaper…is that better?

Cheaper is NOT always better.

Everyone wants a good deal, myself included. However, often in life you get what you pay for!

We’ve all seen the advertisement for the $500 divorce. That could be a really good deal if everything is agreed, it’s just drafting papers and sending for entry.

But, is it a good deal when it doesn’t work? Is it a good deal when it does work, but you weren’t advised of your rights. You did not know about all of the financial and equitable relief you could have gotten.

I’ve seen agreements where the parties agreed to maintain a million dollar whole life insurance policies. They had no idea what that meant or what expense that really involved.

I’ve seen agreements that have not included the correct child support and included terms so onerous a Court would never order it otherwise.

My advice is this, if you spent more than $500 to get married, plan on spending more than $500 to get divorced.

Matthew Thompson is a civil litigation attorney in Mississippi.

SHELTER-IN-Place; Mississippi Custody & Visitation

Essential Travel includes, “Travel required by…court order, including to transport children pursuant to a custody agreement.

We are operating in uncharted waters as far as what to do and when to do it regarding getting out of the house. However, generally speaking the Court expects you to abide by its Order unless it is unsafe to so do. The Court then expects parents to act reasonably, communicate and make reasonable accommodations.

COVID-19 is NOT an excuse to be a terrible parent.

There are a lot of ways to interact safely; in-person, ( so long as it is safe to do so), Facetime, Zoom, telephone, email, text, video and other electronic means.

Matthew Thompson is a Child Custody lawyer and encourages parents to be reasonable and not try to take advantage of these circumstances. Do what you believe is in the best interests of your child.

The Mississippi Supreme Court & COVID-19

The Mississippi Supreme Court has been responsive to the COVID-19 threat and issued a number of Orders regarding same. As the information regarding the virus has changed the Court has made the necessary adjustments. Below is the content of the latest MS Supreme Court Order regarding proceedings throughout Mississippi Courts. Here is a link to all of the Supreme Court Orders, along with other Orders. Source; Mississippi Bar Association.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

  1. All courts are urged to limit in-person, courthouse contact as much as possible by utilizing available technologies…
  2. Judges’ offices or court clerks’ offices shall remain accessible by telephone and email, to the extent possible, during regular business hours…
  3. To the extent that … technologies are prohibited, unavailable, or otherwise infeasible, certain in-person proceedings shall continue to be conducted in all local and state courts including, but not limited to:

    1. a. Jury trials currently in progress.
      b. Department of Child Protection Services emergency matters related to child protection.
      c. Proceedings directly related to:
      (1) Protecting the constitutional rights of all persons;
      (2) Habeas corpus;
      (3) Emergency child-custody orders;
      4) Relief from abuse and orders of protection;
      (5) Mandatory youth court detention hearings for youth held
      in custody;
      (6) Emergency mental-health orders;
      (7) Emergency protection of elderly or vulnerable persons;
      (8) Petitions for temporary injunctive relief;
      (9) Issues involving the COVID-19 public-health emergency;
      (10) Obtaining arrest and search warrants, and other
      proceedings required by law enforcement;
      (11) Ensuring the Mississippi Judiciary has met its
      constitutional requirements.
      d. Any other emergency and time-sensitive matters, in the discretion of individual judges.
  4. Each judge is authorized to determine the manner in which necessary in-person proceedings are to be conducted. Any such in-person proceedings shall be limited to attorneys, parties, witnesses, security officers, members of the press, and other necessary persons, as determined by the trial judge.
  5. All other in-person proceedings beyond those mandated under Paragraph 3., in all local and state courts, are subject to the Court’s prior Emergency Administrative Orders.
  6. In the interest of preventing the transmission of COVID-19, personnel should be posted at all public entry points of all courts in the state, and individuals should be prohibited from entry if they have:

    1. a. In the previous 14 days, visited China, Iran, South Korea, any European countries, or any other high-risk countries identified by the CDC, or traveled on a cruise ship;
      b. Resided with or been in close contact with someone who has been in any of those countries within the previous 14 days;
      c. Traveled domestically within the United States where COVID-19 has sustained widespread community transmission;
      d. Been asked to self-quarantine by any doctor, hospital, or health agency;
      e. Been diagnosed with or have had contact with anyone who has been diagnosed with COVID-19; or
      f. A fever, cough or shortness of breath. Individuals may also be screened for fever through use of a digital forehead and/or ear thermometer.
  7. A case involving an attorney or party who is ill or in a high-risk category shall be rescheduled.
  8. Individuals with legitimate court business who are ill, caring for someone who is ill or in a high-risk category are advised to stay home and request a continuance.
  9. Jurors who are ill, caring for someone who is ill, or in a high-risk category shall have their jury service postponed to a later date.
  10. Bailiffs should discourage congregating outside courtroom doors and encourage social distancing inside the courtroom.
  11. To comply with the CDC’s latest guidance, within the discretion of the trial judge, gatherings may be limited to no more than 10 people.
  12. This Order may be amended, extended, or otherwise modified, as circumstances may dictate.
  13. SO ORDERED.

Matthew Thompson is a Civil Litigation Lawyer in Mississippi and advises you to take necessary precautions concerning COVID-19.

Do NOT do this to get out of paying Child Support!

Man burns cash in bonfire to avoid paying ex.

A Canadian man recently testified that he burned approximately $1 million Canadian cash to prevent him being obligated to pay it to his ex.

The judge didn’t believe him. Jailed him and sanctioned him $2k a day until he disclosed the location of his assets.

Don’t burn cash…

https://www.foxnews.com/world/canada-businessman-burns-1-million-cash

Yep…